Sunday, May 22, 2011

Felda Global, TNB in JV for biomass plant

Key Figure:

1) Investment : RM 120 million

2) Using purely oil palm empty fruit bunches (EFB) : 350,000 ton/year

3) Land usage : 4.2 ha (0.042 square kilometer = 42 000 square meter)

4) Electricity generated : 12.5 MW

---- 

Thestar: Tuesday March 1, 2011

It will invest RM120mil to set up second ‘green’ power facility
PETALING JAYA: Felda Global Group and Tenaga Nasional Bhd have formed a 60:40 joint-venture company, FTJ Bio Power Sdn Bhd, and invest RM120mil to set up a plant that will generate electricity using purely oil palm empty fruit bunches (EFB).
The construction of the plant is scheduled to commence soon on a 4.2ha site in Jengka 9, Pahang and be fully completed in December 2012. The plant will be able to generate 12.5 million watts of electricity.
“The plant will utilise EFB accumulated in the process of producing crude palm oil from seven of the eight mills owned by the Felda Global Group in the Jengka area. These total 350,000 tonnes a year,” said Felda in a statement yesterday.
In the same statement, Felda Global Group president Datuk Sabri Ahmad said that the Malaysian palm oil industry generated some 140 million tonnes of biomass every year from palm oil production, of which EFB comprised 20 million tonnes.
“Felda, as the country's largest oil palm operator, produces three million tonnes of EFB. There is a tremendous opportunity to derive value from these oil palm waste products and harness them into energy,” he said.
The Jengka 9 biomass plant is Felda's second plant that uses only EFB to generate electricity. The first, a 7.5 million watt plant, was built in 2004 and was also Malaysia's first “green” electricity power plant.
“The Felda Global Group is pursuing several projects to fully utilise EFB produced by its mills. Some 70 other projects are in progress and in the pipeline, including composting, pellet production and combined heat and power projects.
“By 2013, EFB produced by all 71 mills in the Felda Global Group will be fully consumed,” it said.

Monday, May 16, 2011

Bullish on solar plants

The waiting FiT scheme is released and to be officially implemented in June. Do really this FiT scheme favoring the RE industry and for everybody to take advantage generating greener energy? Or just for the sake for few numbers of people? Hope it will favor everybody especially homeowner or SMI generators. Who's who can generate and sell electricity?


Thestar: Monday May 16, 2011



By LEONG HUNG YEE


hungyee@thestar.com.my


Better-than-expected response to FiT scheme

PETALING JAYA: Entrepreneurs are rushing to submit their plans to build solar plants following the disclosure of the Feed-in Tariff (FiT) scheme and the imminent gazetting of the Renewable Energy Act.



At a recent briefing held by the special division in the Energy, Green Technology and Water Ministry, as many as 300 people turned up more than twice the expected number to hear presentations by officials on details of the mechanics of the FiT.



One of the reasons for the rush is simply because the FiT will be dished out on a first come, first served basis, once applications are open.



A main speaker at the event, RE/Malaysia Building Integrated Photovoltaic Technology Application (MBIPV) national project team leader and chief technical adviser Ahmad Hadri Haris told StarBiz there would be a “quota” for producing renewable energy given the limited funding for the time being.



Tentatively, the combined quota for renewable energy for 2011 is 111MW for all renewable energy technology. The FiT is scheduled to start in the second half of the year.



Ahmad Hadri said the quota was designed to ensure the Sustainable Energy Development Authority (Seda), the body created to oversee the implementation of the FiT, could be certain that the FiT payment would be honoured for the entire period of contract with the power utility.



“How many MW can be offered annually depends on how much money can be collected for the RE fund, what are the commitments to pay for the FiT and the expected future cost of FiT, and the drive to promote renewable energy.”



Under the initial plan, electricity tariffs will be hiked by 1% to cover cost associated with the FiT scheme. The tariff hike, however, has yet to happen but the Government is committed to kickstart the FiT.



Hence to meet the initial demands of funding the FiT, the Government will allocate RM189mil to finance the higher rates that Tenaga Nasional Bhd (TNB) will be paying for renewable energy although the longer-term plan remains for electricity tariffs to be raised by 1%.



According to government officials, such a tariff hike will bring in RM300mil a year to be administered under the FiT scheme.



“Under the RE Bill, the management and utilisation of the RE fund must be openly reported and tabled in parliament annually. Thus, the public can scrutinise the information. We are also putting the information on the Seda website,” Ahmad Hadri said.



So far, no approval has been given to any party to operate renewable energy as the FiT application is not open yet. The application will be on a first come, first served basis; “therefore there is no opportunity to book any quota,” said Ahmad Hadri.



“To be fair, Seda will first launch the web portal (information) and communicate to the public about the FiT opportunity. We anticipate this to start in late June. After three or four months only will Seda open the FiT application, and the public can apply for up to three years in advance.”



Last month, both the RE Seda Bills were passed by parliament. The FiT is expected to be implemented by the third quarter while Seda will be legally established. Comparing the FiT scheme with other neighbouring countries, Ahmad Hadri said Malaysia's FiT would be better. “Better because we have learned from their experiences and other countries' experiences too. We have adapted all the good parts and avoided the mistakes and also customised for the Malaysian context.”



One interested entrepreneur, Gerard Teoh, said “the Malaysian FiT scheme of RM1.14 for installed capacity above 72kWp and up to and including 1MWp makes building solar farms viable.” Teoh is the executive director of Asia Solar Generation Ventures Sdn Bhd, an investment holding company incorporated to develop and operate solar farms in Malaysia. Its shareholders currently have equity interest in an operating solar farm north of Bangkok.



Teoh opined that the effective period of 21 years was good as it would enable players to recoup their return on investments.



But it is his hope that the application process for producing renewable energy would be done in a fair and transparent manner. He said the licence should be given to only those who are serious and have the capability and financial strength.



Meanwhile, OSK Research head Chris Eng believes biomass was more viable than other RE technology.



He said land costs remained one of the biggest elements for solar producer as cheap land could be located far from the grid. “They will then have to build a long transmission line to connect to the grid.”



Eng expects it would take five years before anything significant can take place in the solar energy sector. He said a lot of promotional campaigns would be needed to inform the public on renewable energy.



“The industry players may jump at the chance to produce solar power but I doubt the residential sector will.”



He expects more biomass plant to be sprouting up but doubts companies which are using it internally would sell it to the grid.

Saturday, April 30, 2011

Total to take majority stake in SunPower

Thestar: Published: Friday April 29, 2011 MYT 7:55:00 AM

French oil company Total SA said on Thursday that it will offer $23.25 for up to 60 percent of the shares of solar panel maker SunPower Corp.
The move will put Europe's third-largest oil company into the growing solar business.
The offer values SunPower at $2.3 billion, and SunPower shares jumped on the news, rising $6.39, or nearly 40 percent, to $22.51 in aftermarket trading after the deal was announced. Total shares fell 15 cents to $63.65.
The companies said Total would also offer SunPower up to $1 billion in lending.
SunPower, based in San Jose, California, makes some of the world's most efficient solar panels, but at relatively high cost. It has struggled to compete with lower-cost panels made by Chinese companies and with thin-film solar panels made by First Solar.
SunPower CEO Tom Werner said the partnership with Total will help SunPower expand its manufacturing capacity at a lower cost.
Philippe Boisseau, president of Total's gas and power division, said the move is looking toward a "long-term transition in which renewable energies will take their place alongside conventional resources." The company aims "to become a major integrated player in solar energy."
Total looked at a number of solar investments for more than two years before picking SunPower, Boisseau said.
Total is based in Courbevoie, France. - AP

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Nuclear power may be necessary for M'sia

 thestar: Wednesday March 23, 2011

By LEONG HUNG YEE
hungyee@thestar.com.my

.....“The right thing is not to do it (nuclear power) at all, but we have no choice. We still need to find
ways to meet demand. I don't think society is willing to accept any brownouts or electricity
disruptions,” Energy Commission (EC) chairman Tan Sri Dr Ahmad Tajuddin Ali said in an
interview with StarBiz.

As it stands now, 58% of power generated in the peninsular is from natural gas, with the
remainder coming from coal (37%) and hydro (5%).
Tajuddin said renewable energy at the moment is not enough to fulfil the energy demand.
He also said the generation cost of nuclear power was lower than that of solar energy. “That
(cost) is one thing. It is the availability of solar itself. Even if we cover the whole of Peninsular
Malaysia with solar panel it is still not enough.”

Monday, March 28, 2011

Copy From MBIPV Website : Feed-in Tariff (FiT)

For reference about FiT from MBIPV:

Summary:

a) As of end October 2010, Malaysia has:
• 40 MW grid-connected power from Biomass;
• 1.7 MW from Biogas;
• 8 MW from Mini-hydro;
• 7 MW from Solid waste; and
• 1.5 MW from Solar PV

b) The following RE resources will be eligible for FiT:
• Biomass (including solid waste);
• Biogas (including landfill gas & sewage);
• Small-hydro; and
• Solar PV.

c) Solar PV 4kw to 30Mw / RM1.23 to RM0.85 : add RM0.26 for BIPV - in building structure. 21 years

Update on the Feed-in Tariff (FiT):
On 15th December 2010, the Renewable Energy Bill  (RE Bill) was presented into Parliament for its first reading. The Bill for Sustainable Energy Development Authority (SEDA Bill) Malaysia was also successfully presented in the same session.
The second and third readings of both the RE and SEDA Bills are scheduled to take place in April 2011. After the Bills have been passed in Parliament, they will be gazetted for enactment. SEDA Malaysia will then be legally established. The Feed-in tariff is envisaged to be implemented by mid-2011.
Resources for FiT:
The Final Report on National Renewable Energy Policy and Action Plan (Hadri et al, submitted to KeTTHA on 18th April 2009)
 Feed-in Tariff for Renewable Energies by Mr. Hans-Josef Fell, German Parliamentarian, Green Party (2MB)

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Nuclear energy tough call for M'sian Govt

Do you think leaders will listen to people opinion?  Errrr! yeah, they do! they do! Surrender become looser, proceed will surely win...

Thestar: Tuesday March 15, 2011

PETALING JAYA: The Government will have to make a tough call now on whether to proceed with its plans to build nuclear plants locally, or look at other renewable energy sources, considering the explosion and radioactive leakage at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Japan.
Analysts contacted by StarBiz said the Government should re-look at other energy sources such as solar or wind as renewable energy options as oppose to narrowing it down to just nuclear energy.
“Considering what has happened in Japan, where people are potentially exposed to radiation leaks, these are serious issues to consider before embarking on the local nuclear project,” said a local research analyst.
Another local analyst covering the utilities sector said that while Malaysia was not subjected to natural disasters such as earthquakes, Malaysia was still open to calamities such as severe floods.
Plans to have nuclear plants locally in slightly over a decade have drawn strong criticisms in the last couple of days, in light of explosions that have happened at a nuclear plant in north-eastern Japan as a consequence of an earthquake and tsunami that took place last Friday.
Several political parties and various groups have urged the government to see whether there is a real need and necessity for a nuclear power plant in the country.
A local daily reported yesterday, citing Energy, Green Technology and Water Minister Datuk Seri Peter Chin Fah Kui, that the Government would not rush to build nuclear plants in the country until all safety aspects and public feedback were considered.
Malaysia plans to build two nuclear power plants that will generate 1,000 MW each with the first plant ready for operation in 2021. The second plant is expected to be ready a year later.
Bernama had reported in December quoting Chin that the Government would engage an international consultant to evaluate the location and requirement for such plants to be built.
The evaluation should be completed by 2013 or 2014 and to call for tenders by 2016. Malaysia heavily relies on gas and coal for its electricity supply as it was the Government's policy to reduce reliance on fossil fuel. Gas accounted for 64% of the country's energy generation while the remainder came from coal.
Chin had also said then that hydro power could assume a prominent role but more so for Sabah and Sarawak while other energy sources such as biomass and wind were too minimal while solar was a good potential but the technology was still very expensive.
Bloomberg reported yesterday that Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said he had instructed nuclear power agencies to carry out a safety review of the country's reactors in light of explosions at a stricken plant in Japan, including the possible impact of a major natural disaster

Saturday, March 12, 2011

Tsunami: Japan Nuclear Plant Hitted. Bad News!

Risk for power, do we need urgently nuclear plant for Malaysia?
--------------

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJ1wFkayp20

IWAKI, Japan – An explosion at a nuclear power station Saturday destroyed a building housing the reactor, but a radiation leak was decreasing despite fears of a meltdown from damage caused by a powerful earthquake and tsunami, officials said.
Government spokesman Yukio Edano said the explosion destroyed the exterior walls of the building where the reactor is placed, but not the actual metal housing enveloping the reactor.
That was welcome news for a country suffering from Friday's double disaster that pulverized the northeastern coast, leaving at least 574 people dead by official count.
The scale of destruction was not yet known, but there were grim signs that the death toll could soar. One report said four whole trains had disappeared Friday and still not been located. Local media reports said at least 1,300 people may have been killed.
Edano said the radiation around the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant had not risen after the blast, but had in fact decreased. He did not say why that was so.
Officials have not given specific radiation readings for the area, though they said they were elevated before the blast: At one point, the plant was releasing each hour the amount of radiation a person normally absorbs from the environment each year.
Virtually any increase in ambient radiation can raise long-term cancer rates, and authorities were planning to distribute iodine to residents in the area, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency. Iodine counteracts the effects of radiation.
The pressure in the reactor was also decreasing after the blast, according to Edano.
The explosion was preceded by puff of white smoke that gathered intensity until it became a huge cloud enveloping the entire facility, located in Fukushima, 20 miles (30 kilometers) from Iwaki. After the explosion, the walls of the building crumbled, leaving only a skeletal metal frame.
Tokyo Power Electric Co., the utility that runs the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant, said four workers suffered fractures and bruises and were being treated at a hospital.
Click image to see photos of quake, tsunami damage

AP/The Yomiuri Shimbun, Masamine Kawaguchi
"We have confirmed that the walls of this building were what exploded, and it was not the reactor's container that exploded," said Edano.
The trouble began at the plant's Unit 1 after the massive 8.9-magnitude earthquake and the tsunami it spawned knocked out power there, depriving it of its cooling system.
The concerns about a radiation leak at the nuclear power plant overshadowed the massive tragedy laid out along a 1,300-mile (2,100-kilometer) stretch of the coastline where scores of villages, towns and cities were battered by the tsunami, packing 23-feet (7-meter) high waves.
It swept inland about six miles (10 kilometers) in some areas, swallowing boats, homes, cars, trees and everything else.
"The tsunami was unbelievably fast," said Koichi Takairin, a 34-year-old truck driver who was inside his sturdy four-ton rig when the wave hit the port town of Sendai.
"Smaller cars were being swept around me," he said. "All I could do was sit in my truck."
His rig ruined, he joined the steady flow of survivors who walked along the road away from the sea and back into the city on Saturday.
Smashed cars and small airplanes were jumbled up against buildings near the local airport, several miles (kilometers) from the shore. Felled trees and wooden debris lay everywhere as rescue workers coasted on boats through murky waters around flooded structures, nosing their way through a sea of debris.
According to official figures, 586 people are missing and 1,105 injured. In addition, police said between 200 and 300 bodies were found along the coast in Sendai, the biggest city in the area near the quake's epicenter.
The true scale of the destruction was still not known more than 24 hours after the quake since washed-out roads and shut airports have hindered access to the area. An untold number of bodies were believed to be buried in the rubble and debris.
Meanwhile, the first wave of military rescuers began arriving by boats and helicopters.
Prime Minister Naoto Kan said 50,000 troops joined rescue and recovery efforts, aided by boats and helicopters. Dozens of countries also offered help. President Barack Obama pledged U.S. assistance following what he called a potentially "catastrophic" disaster. He said one U.S. aircraft carrier was already in Japan and a second was on its way. Washington has also dispatched urban search and rescue teams, according to U.S. Ambassador John Roos.
More than 215,000 people were living in 1,350 temporary shelters in five prefectures, or states, the national police agency said. Since the quake, more than 1 million households have not had water, mostly concentrated in northeast. Some 4 million buildings were without power.
About 24 percent of electricity in Japan is produced by 55 nuclear power units in 17 plants and some were in trouble after the quake.
Japan declared states of emergency at two power plants after their units lost cooling ability.
Although the government spokesman played down fears of radiation leak, the Japanese nuclear agency spokesman Shinji Kinjo acknowledged there were still fears of a meltdown.
A "meltdown" is not a technical term. Rather, it is an informal way of referring to a very serious collapse of a power plant's systems and its ability to manage temperatures.
Yaroslov Shtrombakh, a Russian nuclear expert, said a Chernobyl-style meltdown was unlikely.
"It's not a fast reaction like at Chernobyl," he said. "I think that everything will be contained within the grounds, and there will be no big catastrophe."
In 1986, the Chernobyl nuclear reactor exploded and caught fire, sending a cloud of radiation over much of Europe. That reactor — unlike the Fukushima one — was not housed in a sealed container, so there was no way to contain the radiation once the reactor exploded.
The reactor in trouble has already leaked some radiation: Before the explosion, operators had detected eight times the normal radiation levels outside the facility and 1,000 times normal inside Unit 1's control room.
An evacuation area around the plant was expanded to a radius of 12 miles (20 kilometers) from the six miles (10 kilometers) before. People in the expanded area were advised to leave quickly; 51,000 residents were previously evacuated.
"Everyone wants to get out of the town. But the roads are terrible," said Reiko Takagi, a middle-aged woman, standing outside a taxi company. "It is too dangerous to go anywhere. But we are afraid that winds may change and bring radiation toward us."
The transport ministry said all highways from Tokyo leading to quake-hit areas were closed, except for emergency vehicles. Mobile communications were spotty and calls to the devastated areas were going unanswered.
Local TV stations broadcast footage of people lining up for water and food such as rice balls. In Fukushima, city officials were handing out bottled drinks, snacks and blankets. But there were large areas that were surrounded by water and were unreachable.
One hospital in Miyagi prefecture was seen surrounded by water. The staff had painted an SOS on its rooftop and were waving white flags.
Technologically advanced Japan is well prepared for quakes and its buildings can withstand strong jolts, even a temblor like Friday's, which was the strongest the country has experienced since official records started in the late 1800s. What was beyond human control was the killer tsunami that followed.
Japan's worst previous quake was a magnitude 8.3 temblor in Kanto that killed 143,000 people in 1923, according to the USGS. A magnitude 7.2 quake in Kobe killed 6,400 people in 1995.
Japan lies on the "Ring of Fire" — an arc of earthquake and volcanic zones stretching around the Pacific where about 90 percent of the world's quakes occur, including the one that triggered the Dec. 26, 2004, Indian Ocean tsunami that killed an estimated 230,000 people in 12 countries. A magnitude-8.8 quake that shook central Chile in February 2010 also generated a tsunami and killed 524 people.
___
Kageyama reported from Tokyo. Associated Press writers Malcolm J. Foster, Mari Yamaguchi, Tomoko A. Hosaka and Shino Yuasa in Tokyo, Jay Alabaster in Sendai, and Sylvia Hui in London also contributed.