Saturday, April 14, 2012

from http://www.pv-tech.org

NPD Solarbuzz: Top-10 PV cell producers in 2011

  •   Chinese and Taiwanese manufacturers maintained their prominence, securing 8 of the top-10 positions.
    Chinese and Taiwanese manufacturers maintained their prominence, securing 8 of the top-10 positions.
  •   But the number-one position in 2011 goes to First Solar, the only thin-film manufacturer on the list.
    But the number-one position in 2011 goes to First Solar, the only thin-film manufacturer on the list.

Blogger

Finlay Colville
Finlay Colville
Finlay Colville is a Senior Analyst with Solarbuzz, responsible for reporting on solar manufacturing equipment including technologies, trends and forecasts within the solar industry. Prior to joining Solarbuzz in April 2010, he was Director of Marketing for Coherent, Inc.’s solar business unit. He has a B.Sc. in physics from the University of Glasgow and a Ph.D. in laser physics from the University of St. Andrews, Scotland.
Not withstanding the tumultuous year for solar cell and thin-film manufacturers, the top-10 rankings for 2011 saw only a few changes in position from 12 months ago. Chinese and Taiwanese manufacturers maintained their prominence, securing 8 of the top-10 positions. But the number-one position in 2011 goes to First Solar, the only thin-film manufacturer on the list.
According to new research contained within the latest NPD Solarbuzz PV Equipment Quarterly, the top-10 manufacturers now account for 40% of global production, down four percentage points from one year ago.
While the decline in contribution from the top-10 cell makers may appear at odds with the current shakeout of uncompetitive cell makers, it simply reflects the sheer number of manufacturers that sought to populate the midstream segment during 2011.
Over 350 c-Si cell and thin-film manufacturers began the year with production targets ranging from tens of MWs to over 2GW. Although few of the tier 2 and tier 3 manufacturers came close to meeting their ambitious goals, it was their collective bullishness (33% Y/Y production increase) that would become the catalyst in the oversupply that caused the severe ASP declines during 2011.
Until recently, manufacturers would have been brimming with excitement at the brand value from securing a high ranking. However, with the collapse of market price levels, companies now place greater importance on securing status through cost leadership. This means that rankings based on internal production now carry less impact than each company’s weighted cost structure, conferred by the aggregate of their internal and outsourced production.
However, compiling the ranking of the in-house cell producers (including both c-Si cell and thin-film panel data, normalized to module power ratings) does still provide some leading indicators that can subsequently be used as a health-check on midstream PV manufacturing trends for 2012.
There has already been extensive industry commentary on the highly-visible demise in cell manufacturing across Japan, Europe and North America during 2011. 2012 is likely to be no less challenging for these manufacturers as Chinese and Taiwanese producers continue to leverage their cost leadership in end markets.
Third-party tolling and contract manufacturing was (again) a major feature of 2011 by companies active across the c-Si value-chain. The overcapacity and oversupply environment provided tier 1 vertically-integrated c-Si manufacturers with considerable flexibility to produce cells in-house or utilize tier 2 (or Taiwan-based) cell makers for their own-brand modules. While most tier 1 cell makers had the nameplate capacity to supply all their module requirements during 2011, many took advantage of the very low spot market conditions to outsource up to 30% of the cells needed.
That First Solar heads the pack during 2011 and is the only thin-film manufacturer challenging the leading c-Si cell makers comes as no surprise. First Solar enacted on production to meet its strong in-house project pipeline, setting out a downstream-integrated business model that few others have been able to follow. Going forward though, the challenge for thin-film producers will be how to best compete against the dramatically more competitive, low-cost c-Si value-chain.
The strong demand for high-quality c-Si cells from downstream module producers in China, Japan, Europe and North America has retained Taiwan producers Motech, Gintech, and Neo Solar Power in the top-10 list. Cells produced in Taiwan have increasingly been securing industry-leading brand where manufacturers have been able to successfully combine quality (high-efficiency and high yield) and low-cost. Other Taiwan cell makers Solartech and DelSolar also feature strongly within the top cell rankings for 2011. Collectively, these five Taiwan cell makers produced more than 3.6GW during 2011, with much of this cleared from inventory by year-end.
The anti-dumping case in the US has created an air of uncertainty and confusion around cell-production origin. Contingency plans being drawn up by many of the leading Chinese cell producers for sales into North America are based upon the use of Taiwan-produced cells. Therefore, this is likely to cause at least a short term increase in the share of cell production from Taiwan.
Another highlight is the emergence of Trina Solar. At a time of ‘flight-to-quality’, the success of Trina transitioning from a module-only to a cell-and-module leader is a consequence of the company’s focus on cost structure. Ignoring the temptation to introduce high-risk advanced cell concepts into production, Trina has been thriving on low-cost, standard process-flow cell production lines.
The forecast for 2012 in-house cell production will further extend the trends shown for 2011, with possibly LDK-Solar added as a leading cell producer. However, with no shortage of nameplate capacity shipped to lower tier producers, many still harbour aspirations to gain market-share from the top-ranked companies. Ultimately, it will be the combination of low-cost and high-quality product, together with access to end markets, that will determine who emerges at the top of the list in 2012, during another year where policy adjustments in Europe will temper the industry’s growth rate.

What happen to PV / Renewable Industry????


from http://www.pv-tech.org/guest_blog/pv_module_costs_and_prices_what_is_really_happening_now_5478?utm_campaign=everything-rss-feed&utm_source=pvtech-feeds

PV module costs and prices: what is really happening now?

  •   Crystalline PV module and polysilicon prices.
    Crystalline PV module and polysilicon prices.

Blogger

Sam Wilkinson
Sam Wilkinson
Sam Wilkinson is the Photovoltaics Group Research Analyst at IMS Research. Sam is based at the company’s headquarters in Wellingborough, UK.
PV-Tech recently announced that its most read blog post of 2011 was an article from IMS Research entitled ‘PV module costs and prices – what is really happening?’, written almost 18 months ago in August 2010. The popularity of this post clearly says something about what the PV industry was talking about throughout all of last year, and still will be talking about in 2012.
Looking back now at the article I thought it would be interesting to revisit some of the predictions made versus what happened in reality, as well as considering what the future holds 12 months on.
Why didn’t the PV industry see 2011’s price collapse coming and why did it hurt so much?
I’m sure no one will disagree that making predictions about the PV industry is a challenge. Whilst every effort can be made to include every possible outcome or variable, an unpredictable political decision, or better-than-expected weather conditions (e.g. Germany at the end of 2011) can make a big difference. But it looks like we got this one right, when we predicted back in 2010 “that installations in EMEA will decline by 80% Q-o-Q in Q1’11. This, coupled with capacities that have been ramped to their maximum in order to serve the strong demand of H2’10, is forecast to quickly reverse the current imbalance between supply and demand, and average PV module prices are forecast to commence their downward trend once again.”
As early as the middle of 2010, IMS Research (and we weren’t the only ones I’m sure) were predicting that 2011 would see oversupply, and ultimately trouble, for suppliers; but still the capacity expansions continued and production lines continued to churn out more modules causing inventory levels to balloon. The industry was still in expansion mode after spending all of 2010 trying to keep capacity up with demand.
Throughout 2011, IMS Research predicted that demand would grow by at least 20%, though few agreed with us. As late as September 2011, PV component suppliers were still saying that “there is no way installations will go past 20GW - it’s going to be more like 16GW”. Our latest analysis and checks show that in actual fact installations exceeded even our predictions and more than 26GW of PV was installed in 2011 (note we count installations, not connections).  So why then did 2011 hurt suppliers so much? Most industries would have been delighted at the prospect of 30% underlying demand growth, so why couldn’t they ‘see’ that demand and why did PV manufacturers have such a terrible 2011?
There are two key reasons why.
Firstly, a 30% increase in demand is a somewhat modest increase in comparison to the capacity expansions executed by the majority of suppliers, who looked to double their capacities (and production) during the year.  Many suppliers were still able to grow their shipments in 2011, but not by enough to stop their newly installed production equipment from remaining expensively underutilised or their stock levels from growing rapidly. Whilst demand for modules was growing, in comparison to 2010’s triple-digit growth, it felt like it wasn’t.
Secondly, although full-year megawatt shipments and installations grew considerably, much of the demand came towards the end of the year. In fact, nearly 40% of installations happened in the last quarter. What this meant was that the relatively weak demand in the first half of the year led to high channel inventory and collapsing prices as many suppliers sold at a loss, holding out for the good times to return. The fiercely competitive pricing seen throughout 2011 meant that industry revenues actually declined by around 15% for PV modules. More modules were made, more modules were shipped, and more modules were installed; but the suppliers of them made less money.
Costs are down– but not as much as prices
Last year will certainly be remembered for being the year that prices were, for the most part, in free fall. Much has been written about the spectacular decline of ASPs throughout 2011, but the simple facts are that demand in Europe stopped abruptly in early 2011 caused largely by the cancellation of Italy’s FiT, but capacity expansions continued uninterrupted. The result was that whilst modules could easily be sold at almost any price in 2010, the market suddenly became very competitive. With gigawatts of modules flooding the market, and very little to differentiate one from the other, unsurprisingly competition naturally came down to price. However, many were surprised at just how low prices went. Crystalline prices at the end of 2011 were a massive 45% lower than they had been at the end of 2010, exceeding even the most aggressive forecast for price reductions.
It doesn’t take an economist to see that to significantly reduce prices (and survive), you will need to significantly reduce your costs as well, and this was certainly not the case. No supplier was able to reduce their cost structures at the same rate as their prices and margins throughout the industry have certainly felt the consequences. Average gross-margins for crystalline PV module suppliers have fallen into the single-digits, having been in the high twenties a year ago.
For crystalline module manufacturers, the biggest difficulty in reducing costs lies in the comparatively stubborn pricing of polysilicon. Whilst much has been reported of polysilicon prices declining rapidly and reaching record lows, particularly in the second half of 2011, the reality is that the silicon being offered at these low prices is from lower-tier suppliers and sold on the spot market. As the majority of PV-grade silicon is supplied under long-term contracts, fluctuations in spot pricing have only a small effect on the actual average price that suppliers are buying polysilicon at.
How will suppliers become profitable again?
With incentive levels likely to be pared back considerably in 2012, module suppliers’ cost structures remain at the mercy of stubborn long-term polysilicon prices, and hopes for future cost reduction are understandably pinned poly prices falling. This is likely to happen in 2012, especially given that the capacity expansions of Tier-1 suppliers (originally put in motion several years ago) that are due to come online during the year. Tier-1 capacity for polysilicon is predicted to reach close to 300,000 MT in 2012 – enough to serve over 40GW of installations; yet installations are forecast to be broadly flat at 26-28 GW. With Tier-1 polysilicon capacity alone enough to serve the entire market, and suppliers like GCL claiming costs are reaching close to US$20/kg, things are likely to get a lot more competitive for the big polysilicon players. This will create some much needed breathing room back to downstream manufacturers’ cost structures.
With impending polysilicon price drops likely, many suppliers have begun accepting penalty charges for cancelling long-term supply contracts in order to purchase polysilicon, wafers and cells on the spot market instead, or renegotiate new contracts.
Looking back at 2011, there are certain similarities that can be drawn to 2009 (changes in government subsidies causing a sharp slowdown in demand, leading to over supply, falling prices and consequently a strong end to the year and many being surprised that installations grew), but there is one clear difference – it will not be followed by another year of massive demand like 2010 and 2012 will undoubtedly be a lot tougher for suppliers.

Saturday, March 24, 2012

Solar Flare or Storm???

Do anyone come across  Discovery documentary about solar storm. Solar also can be damaging as well. For those did not watch yet, attached below for your view. Muslims we should aways prepare for our next world journey..












M8.7 Solar Flare and Earth Directed CME
01.25.12
UPDATE 01.25.12: The geomagnetic storm on the night of January 24-25 produced brilliant aurora at high latitudes as seen in this image from Sweden.


Aurora from geomagnetic storm seen in Sweden on 01.24.12.
› View larger
Image Courtesy of Peter Rosén.




UPDATE 01.24.12: The coronal mass ejection CME collided with Earth's magnetic field a little after 10 AM ET on January 24, 2012. NOAA's Space Weather Prediction Center has categorized the resulting storm as "strong" -- or S3 (with S5 being the highest) -- storm. Solar radiation storms can affect satellite operations and short wave radio propagation, but cannot harm humans on Earth. Auroras may well be visible tonight at higher latitudes such as Michigan and Maine in the U.S., and perhaps even lower.

Friday, March 23, 2012

GE and Sabah firm said to be close to RM750mil geothermal plant deal



More news on greener energy... so what is your corporation move for corporate sosial responsibility (CSR)? Many just talk only... no action...

Thestar: Friday March 23, 2012

By YAP LENG KUEN
lengkuen@thestar.com.my


3 in green energy talks 1MDB
PETALING JAYA: 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) and General Electric (GE) are among three companies currently in talks to develop the country's first geothermal plant in Apas, Tawau.
The third company in the venture, tagged at between RM750mil and RM800mil, is a Sabah-based green energy company which has inked a power purchase agreement with Sabah Electricity Sdn Bhd.
Sources familiar with the project told StarBiz that the companies were in the final stage of negotiations and expected to reach a joint agreement soon, possibly end of the month.
The renewable energy plant, when fully completed, can generate a total capacity of 67MW, supplying electricity to Tawau's population of 398,000.
The emission-free geothermal plant will tap natural hot fluids from the ground for steam production to drive the steam turbine generator; it will generate 36MW under phase one and an additional 31MW under phase two.
When contacted, a 1MDB spokesperson said the company did not comment on speculation.
Following 1MDB's recent acquisition of Tanjong Energy Holdings Sdn Bhd, CEO Shahrol Halmi had said it “signals the first step towards fulfilling the shareholder's aspiration for a more holistic eco-system to drive long-term energy security”.
According to the sources, GE will provide technical know-how, global expertise, equipment and technology.
GE is currently involved in Indonesia's biggest geothermal power plant, the Wayang Windu power plant, which taps into naturally occurring underground pockets of steam and hot water with wells as deep as three km.
In March 2011, Deputy Natural Resources and Environment Minister Tan Sri Joseph Kurup revealed that studies regarding the electricity generation potential of up to 67MW from geothermal resources discovered at a geothermal site in Apas had been completed.
Although a study by the Mineral and Geosciences Department was not a detailed one, the technical aspects indicated that the geothermal site in Apas had the potential to generate enough electricity to cater for the needs of the Tawau people.
The study also found a reservoir about 2,000m to 3,000m below the earth's surface with water at temperatures of 220-236 degrees Celsius. This heat was more than sufficient to generate electricity, Kurup had said after visiting the site.
On Tuesday, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak said: “Malaysia's embracing of green technology is not only to conserve and preserve its resources, but is also envisaged to act as a new economic impetus for the country.”
The Prime Minister said the renewable energy target under the 10th Malaysia Plan was 5.5% of the total capacity mix in 2015 or 985MW of generating capacity, from less than 1% previously.

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Time frame set for renewable energy to impact electricity supply




thestar: Monday March 19, 2012


Time frame set for renewable energy to impact electricity supply

By YAP LENG KUEN

lengkuen@thestar.com.my





PUTRAJAYA: A three-year time frame is being set for renewable energy (RE) activities to kick off with expected higher funding and quotas.



“We are now at the stage of looking at this preliminary period in the implementation process,” Minister of Energy, Green Technology and Water Datuk Seri Peter Chin told StarBiz.



“We would like to see a higher level of RE being generated in the future. But it is better to be more cautious and look at what this preliminary process is like in our implementation and the administration process by the Sustainable Energy Development Authority Malaysia (SEDA Malaysia). We have to learn from this preliminary phase before we proceed in a more aggressive manner.





We are looking at about three years to see how this RE is performing especially with solar energy. — Datuk Seri Peter Chin

“We are looking at about three years to see how this RE is performing especially with solar energy for which the cost of solar production is getting lower and lower.”



On the progress of the RE sector, Chin said: “We are restricted by the amount in the kitty called the RE Fund for which we can only collect 1% from each account holder of Tenaga Nasional Bhd. Therefore, the quota that is being created to implement this feed-in tariff has to be rather small.



“Because of that, it will take time for RE to really take effect in terms of the impact that it can create on the total electricity supply.



“If the fund is higher, the quota can be increased and more RE can be generated. That will be good for the country in terms of emission of carbon and the fact that RE is considered a cleaner source of energy.”



Currently, 398 applicants have received the feed-in approvals. Out of these, 71 have signed the standardised renewable energy power purchase agreements (REPPAs).



FIT payments can only be made to those developers who have signed the REPPAs and implemented their projects successfully.



Industry players suggest there should be a liability imposed on those who have not implemented their projects as money is a scarce resource.



“In fact, they should be relieved of their allocation so that others can take their place. Deadlines should be set for implementation; under the REPPAs, there may be deadlines stipulated but who is actually monitoring all this?” asked an industry player.



SEDA Malaysia acts as a one-stop centre to facilitate interested parties in all matters related to RE; it is also working with relevant training institutes to set up a centre of excellence for each RE source.



In terms of research and development, SEDA Malaysia is working on an R&D roadmap for RE.



It has also been tasked to raise awareness on RE; one main awareness programme that has been planned is a sustainable energy conference

Govt considering inclusion of wind and thermal as renewable energy sources



thestar: Wednesday March 21, 2012


Govt considering inclusion of wind and thermal as renewable energy sources





PETALING JAYA: The Government is considering including wind and thermal in the country's renewable energy (RE) mix, said Energy, Green Technology and Water Minister Datuk Seri Peter Chin.



“Under Seda (Sustainable Energy Development Authority), we had only included solar, biomass, biogas, and hydro (to generate RE).



“So now we are looking into wind as well as thermal,” he said after witnessing the signing of a technology transfer agreement for the maglev turbine system between China-based Shenzhen Timar Scenery Energy Technology Co Ltd and Timar Wind Solar Energy Sdn Bhd.





Clean resources: (from left) Chin, Lee, Shenzhen Timar Scenery Energy chairman Lin Wen Qi and Energy, Green Technology and Water Ministry senior secretary (energy sector) Badaruddin Mahyudin at the signing ceremony.

He added that the outlook for wind power was bright and wind power capacity was expected to achieve about 50,000MW this year.



In many parts of the world, Chin said, using wind for power generation was still a more cost effective option compared with solar.



With the commencement of the Renewable Energy Act 2011, feed-in-tariff system, and the setting up of Seda as the central authority for the RE industry, he said Malaysia's RE capacity was projected to reach 2,080MW by 2020, or some 11% of the total peak electricity demand.



Domestic RE generation could also prevent some 42 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions by 2020 and create at least RM70bil in revenue from RE plants and over 50,000 jobs in the sector.



Meanwhile, Timar Wind Solar Energy chief executive officer Simon Lee said that for this year, the company would invest RM500mil in phase one of its energy production for both the local and South-East Asian markets. Its factory would begin operations this year.



Its factory would begin operations this year.



Wednesday, March 14, 2012

IRM gets OK to set up solar station



Wednesday March 14, 2012

IRM gets OK to set up solar station


PETALING JAYA: Plastics manufacturer IRM Group Bhd has been granted the feed-in approval by the Sustainable Energy Development Authority (Seda) to install a solar power station with a maximum capacity of 5MW in Kangar, Perlis.
The company said in an announcement to Bursa Malaysia that the feed-in tariff was scheduled to commence from April 9, 2013 and to last 21 years while a power purchase agreement would also be signed with Seda and Tenaga Nasional Bhd.